We’re well into the new year and the COVID vaccine has already been rolled out in a number of countries including Norway, the US, and the UK.
Remember, this is despite the following facts:
- vaccine trials were set up for success;
- the phase 3 (and in Pfizer’s case phase 1) trials are still ongoing;
- the vaccines are based on experimental mRNA technology never approved before for human use;
- the vaccines have never been proven to be safer than the disease itself and;
- long-term adverse effects have not been assessed.
Dr. Alex Vasquez, who holds 3 doctorate degrees and has authored a number of textbooks on functional medicine, posted the following on his Twitter account:
“When did patient education, precautionary principle, and informed consent leave medicine? Asking for humanity.”
His tweet included a screenshot of a study that was published at the end of 2020 in the International Journal of Clinical Practice. The title of which is ‘Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease’. The screenshot is zoomed into the study’s conclusion which reads:
“COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated.”
The methods section of the abstract reads:
“Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for COVID-19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.”
In other words, this study serves as a warning that people are likely to get a lot sicker by taking this vaccine than if they didn’t take it. And now that the vaccines have been rolled out, there is much real-world evidence to support the authors’ findings.
A recent Bloomberg article states that 23 elderly people in Norway recently died after their first dose of the experimental shot. The article states that:
“For those with the most severe frailty, even relatively mild vaccine side effects can have serious consequences,” the Norwegian Institute of Public Health said. “For those who have a very short remaining life span anyway, the benefit of the vaccine may be marginal or irrelevant.”
This is not surprising at all considering that the vaccine trials were not set up to measure efficacy in the frail, elderly population. This is highlighted very clearly in an article by Peter Doshi published in the British Medical Journal.
In the US, the CDC runs the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System called ‘VAERS’. A quick search in their database reveals that as of January 19th, there have already been ~7,000 reports of adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine logged, including 55 deaths.
Click to zoom
7,000 may not seem like a huge number considering how many shots have already been administered. However, it’s important to realize that very few physicians ever report to VEARS. That’s right, the platform is severely under-utilized and this has been known for some time.
For example, a survey conducted by the CDC in 2005 found that 55% of physicians remained silent even after witnessing one or more vaccine adverse reactions.
A 2011 report compiled by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc stated that fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse reactions were reported to VAERS. It’s clear then that all vaccine reactions are underreported, which means that the actual number of adverse reactions caused by the COVID-19 vaccine in the US is likely much larger.
Furthermore, just recently, California health officials have called for a pause on the rollout of the Moderna vaccine due to a staggeringly high number of possible allergic reactions.
In an article written by Children’s Health Defense, they quote Dr. Pan (one of California’s top epidemiologists) who states:
“A higher-than-usual number of possible allergic reactions were reported with a specific lot of Moderna vaccine administered at one community vaccination clinic.”
It is not only shocking but saddening that an experimental vaccine can be rolled out with such force and such blind endorsement by the mainstream authorities, while decades worth of research and evidence supporting nutritional medicine is ignored.
If authorities cared about health they wouldn’t allow our food to be processed and poisoned and they wouldn’t blatantly ignore the dangers of EMFs. Instead of distributing expensive vaccines, they would ensure everyone had access to healthy food along with vitamin C, D, zinc, and other important, immune-boosting nutrients.
But they don’t care about health. They care about money and control. No doubt they will tell us that the new vaccines only create immunity for ‘up to a year’ and so the COVID shot will become a yearly injection just like the flu shot, generating massive profits for the Big Money Machine.